Everything About ___
Live briefing

Everything about Impact evaluation

Assessment of particular interventions

Impact evaluation assesses the extent to which an intervention is causally responsible for observed outcomes, intended and unintended. In contrast to outcome monitoring, which examines whether targets have been achieved, impact evaluation is structured to answer the question: how would outcomes such as participants' well-being have changed if the intervention had not been undertaken? This involves counterfactual analysis, that is, "a comparison between what actually happened and what would have happened in the absence of the intervention." Impact evaluations seek to answer cause-and-effect questions. In other words, they look for the changes in outcome that are directly attributable to a program. Wikipedia →

🧭 Start here: a 6-step reading path

  1. Read the overview: Impact evaluationA 5-minute orientation
  2. Skim a recent paper: On the evaluation of climate change impact modelsInfluential work since 2022
  3. Pick up a classic book: Generic environmental impact statement for license renewal of nuclear plantsThe most-reprinted book on the subject
  4. Read the landmark paper: Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework.Cited 6,092 times
  5. Go sideways: Quasi-experimentA closely related topic
  6. Go sideways: Randomized controlled trialA closely related topic

📖 Definitions

No dictionary entry for this exact phrase.

🏆 Landmark papers (most cited)

🆕 Influential since 2022

📚 Books worth reading

Ranked by number of editions on Open Library, a rough measure of how lasting a book is.

🔗 Related topics