Live briefing
Everything about Demarcation problem
Philosophical question of how to distinguish between science and non-science
In philosophy of science and epistemology, the demarcation problem is the question of how to distinguish between science and non-science. It also examines the boundaries between science, pseudoscience and other products of human activity, like art and literature and beliefs. The debate continues after more than two millennia of dialogue among philosophers of science and scientists in various fields. The debate has consequences for what can be termed "scientific" in topics such as education and public policy. Wikipedia →
🧭 Start here: a 6-step reading path
- Read the overview: Demarcation problemA 5-minute orientation
- Skim a recent paper: Potency and safety analysis of hemp delta-9 products: the hemp vs. cannabis demarcation problemInfluential work since 2022
- Pick up a classic book: The distinction between falsification and refutation in the demarcation problem of Karl PopperThe most-reprinted book on the subject
- Read the landmark paper: The new demarcation problemCited 120 times
- Go sideways: VerificationismA closely related topic
- Go sideways: PseudoscienceA closely related topic
📖 Definitions
No dictionary entry for this exact phrase.
🏆 Landmark papers (most cited)
The new demarcation problem
A pragmatic approach to the demarcation problem
Science, Values, and the New Demarcation Problem
The Demarcation Problem in Jurisprudence: A New Case for Scepticism
Diagnosing Pseudoscience – by Getting Rid of the Demarcation Problem
Normal Explanations of the Paranormal: The Demarcation Problem and Fraud in Parapsychology
Why We Should Be Suspicious of Conspiracy Theories: A Novel Demarcation Problem
The Multicriterial Approach to the Problem of Demarcation
🆕 Influential since 2022
Potency and safety analysis of hemp delta-9 products: the hemp vs. cannabis demarcation problem
The Matrix of AI Agency: On the Demarcation Problem in Social Theory
No one solution to the “new demarcation problem”?: A view from the trenches
A Contextualist Solution to the Demarcation Problem
Defying boundaries: The problem of demarcation in Norwegian refugee services
📚 Books worth reading
The distinction between falsification and refutation in the demarcation problem of Karl PopperNicolae Sfetcu · 2019
Ranked by number of editions on Open Library, a rough measure of how lasting a book is.
🔗 Related topics
- Verificationism Verificationism, also known as the verification principle or the verifiability criterion of meaning, is a doctrine in philosophy which asserts that a statement…
- Pseudoscience Pseudoscience consists of statements, beliefs, or practices that claim to be scientific but are inherently incompatible with the scientific method. Pseudoscienc…
- Logical positivism Logical positivism (also known as logical empiricism or neo-positivism) was a philosophical movement rooted in the empiricist tradition, seeking to formulate…
- Falsifiability Falsifiability is a standard of evaluation of scientific statements, including theories and hypotheses. A statement is falsifiable if it belongs to a language…
- Inductivism Inductivism is the traditional and still commonplace philosophy of scientific method to develop scientific theories. Inductivism aims to neutrally observe…
- Paul Thagard Paul Richard Thagard FRSC (/ˈθeɪɡɑːrd/; born 1950) is a Canadian philosopher who specializes in cognitive science, philosophy of mind, and the philosophy…
- Critical rationalism Critical rationalism is Karl Popper's answer to what he considered the most important problems of epistemology and philosophy of science: the problems…
- Philosophy of science Philosophy of science (also theory of science) is the branch of philosophy concerned with the foundations, methods, and implications of science. Amongst…